One more attack on #Modi Sarkar with FAKE REPORT!
A MUST READ TILL END!
Dear @SupriyaShrinate, as usual, in a hurry to attack .@smritiirani Ji, you have shown your & CONgress' Intellectual Bankruptcy by ignoring basic facts. So pls allow me to EXPOSE your Lies.
Article published on 12th Feb, 24 on JAMA Network on SO-CALLED ‘zero food children’ in Bharat is deliberate & malicious attempt to sensationalize fake news.
🔥There is no scientific definition of “zero food children”; The methodology followed is opaque.
🔥JAMA article does not acknowledge importance of breast milk for infants.
🔥Study has not referred to publicly available data of 8+ Crore children measured on Poshan Tracker through the 13.9 lakh Anganwadi Centres across Bharat. In fact the fraud report is based on sample size of 3 Lakh only from 92 Nations which mainly include Poor Nations from Africa & South America.
🔥Effectiveness of Poshan 2.0 in reducing stunting, wasting & underweight prevalence in general has been appreciated by a research study conducted by World Bank.
🔥Under PMMVY Scheme ₹5000 is provided to pregnant women for first child and ₹6000 for second (girl) child to encourage appropriate health seeking behaviour and immunization of the child.
🔥The paper reports that 19.3% Bharatiya children were ‘Zero Food’ children. It means they did not receive any animal milk or formula milk or solid or semisolid food during 24 hours of survey. But
In Table 3 of the paper, the authors note that ‘Zero Food’ children who were also ‘Nonbreastfed’ were only 1.5%. What does it mean Mathematician Supriya Shrinate?
It means that 17.8% ‘Zero Food’ children had received Breastmilk (19.3 (-) 1.5 = 17.8). Since breastmilk is a wholesome food with quality protein, carbohydrate, fat and micronutrients, and is recommended upto 2 years of age, these 17.8% children cannot be labelled as Zero Food’. Simple.
If this is not enough, no primary research has been conducted by Mr. S. V. Subramanian and co-authors in the study to arrive at such broad and incorrect generalizations on the nutritional status of children in Bharat, which
they themselves have admitted to deep misgivings on the data and have referred to at least 9 limitations which make their study absolutely unreliable.
And you are trying to defame Modi Sarkar with such malafide report! I feel Pity on you & your breed from CONgress & Prestitutes, who don't yet realise that we are not living in 1980s when Information Tools were not available.
Well tried! But ultimately, you fall on your face AS USUAL.
If you ask me #WhatsWrongWithIndia, I'll just say CONgress & Leftists are Wrong FOR Bharat!
A MUST READ TILL END!
Dear @SupriyaShrinate, as usual, in a hurry to attack .@smritiirani Ji, you have shown your & CONgress' Intellectual Bankruptcy by ignoring basic facts. So pls allow me to EXPOSE your Lies.
Article published on 12th Feb, 24 on JAMA Network on SO-CALLED ‘zero food children’ in Bharat is deliberate & malicious attempt to sensationalize fake news.
🔥There is no scientific definition of “zero food children”; The methodology followed is opaque.
🔥JAMA article does not acknowledge importance of breast milk for infants.
🔥Study has not referred to publicly available data of 8+ Crore children measured on Poshan Tracker through the 13.9 lakh Anganwadi Centres across Bharat. In fact the fraud report is based on sample size of 3 Lakh only from 92 Nations which mainly include Poor Nations from Africa & South America.
🔥Effectiveness of Poshan 2.0 in reducing stunting, wasting & underweight prevalence in general has been appreciated by a research study conducted by World Bank.
🔥Under PMMVY Scheme ₹5000 is provided to pregnant women for first child and ₹6000 for second (girl) child to encourage appropriate health seeking behaviour and immunization of the child.
🔥The paper reports that 19.3% Bharatiya children were ‘Zero Food’ children. It means they did not receive any animal milk or formula milk or solid or semisolid food during 24 hours of survey. But
In Table 3 of the paper, the authors note that ‘Zero Food’ children who were also ‘Nonbreastfed’ were only 1.5%. What does it mean Mathematician Supriya Shrinate?
It means that 17.8% ‘Zero Food’ children had received Breastmilk (19.3 (-) 1.5 = 17.8). Since breastmilk is a wholesome food with quality protein, carbohydrate, fat and micronutrients, and is recommended upto 2 years of age, these 17.8% children cannot be labelled as Zero Food’. Simple.
If this is not enough, no primary research has been conducted by Mr. S. V. Subramanian and co-authors in the study to arrive at such broad and incorrect generalizations on the nutritional status of children in Bharat, which
they themselves have admitted to deep misgivings on the data and have referred to at least 9 limitations which make their study absolutely unreliable.
And you are trying to defame Modi Sarkar with such malafide report! I feel Pity on you & your breed from CONgress & Prestitutes, who don't yet realise that we are not living in 1980s when Information Tools were not available.
Well tried! But ultimately, you fall on your face AS USUAL.
If you ask me #WhatsWrongWithIndia, I'll just say CONgress & Leftists are Wrong FOR Bharat!
One more attack on #Modi Sarkar with FAKE REPORT!
A MUST READ TILL END!
Dear @SupriyaShrinate, as usual, in a hurry to attack .@smritiirani Ji, you have shown your & CONgress' Intellectual Bankruptcy by ignoring basic facts. So pls allow me to EXPOSE your Lies.
Article published on 12th Feb, 24 on JAMA Network on SO-CALLED ‘zero food children’ in Bharat is deliberate & malicious attempt to sensationalize fake news.
🔥There is no scientific definition of “zero food children”; The methodology followed is opaque.
🔥JAMA article does not acknowledge importance of breast milk for infants.
🔥Study has not referred to publicly available data of 8+ Crore children measured on Poshan Tracker through the 13.9 lakh Anganwadi Centres across Bharat. In fact the fraud report is based on sample size of 3 Lakh only from 92 Nations which mainly include Poor Nations from Africa & South America.
🔥Effectiveness of Poshan 2.0 in reducing stunting, wasting & underweight prevalence in general has been appreciated by a research study conducted by World Bank.
🔥Under PMMVY Scheme ₹5000 is provided to pregnant women for first child and ₹6000 for second (girl) child to encourage appropriate health seeking behaviour and immunization of the child.
🔥The paper reports that 19.3% Bharatiya children were ‘Zero Food’ children. It means they did not receive any animal milk or formula milk or solid or semisolid food during 24 hours of survey. But
In Table 3 of the paper, the authors note that ‘Zero Food’ children who were also ‘Nonbreastfed’ were only 1.5%. What does it mean Mathematician Supriya Shrinate?
It means that 17.8% ‘Zero Food’ children had received Breastmilk (19.3 (-) 1.5 = 17.8). Since breastmilk is a wholesome food with quality protein, carbohydrate, fat and micronutrients, and is recommended upto 2 years of age, these 17.8% children cannot be labelled as Zero Food’. Simple.
If this is not enough, no primary research has been conducted by Mr. S. V. Subramanian and co-authors in the study to arrive at such broad and incorrect generalizations on the nutritional status of children in Bharat, which
they themselves have admitted to deep misgivings on the data and have referred to at least 9 limitations which make their study absolutely unreliable.
And you are trying to defame Modi Sarkar with such malafide report! I feel Pity on you & your breed from CONgress & Prestitutes, who don't yet realise that we are not living in 1980s when Information Tools were not available.
Well tried! But ultimately, you fall on your face AS USUAL.
If you ask me #WhatsWrongWithIndia, I'll just say CONgress & Leftists are Wrong FOR Bharat!
0 टिप्पणीहरू
0 सेयरहरू
3057 हेराइको संख्याहरू
0 Reviews
English
हिन्दी
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek
Arabic
French
অসমীয়া
বাংলা